选择海南海空坐位自己的投资对象似乎有些简单，只是觉得是一家有潜力的公司。
上周的收盘价格是8.43，先不讨论价格是否符合其价值，但是目前来说觉得始终不是很好的价位
目前是这么觉得的，我不是技术派人士，也不懂技术，但是上升趋势上我觉得有回落的技术需求
至少目前是这么觉得，可惜我的技术不好，不然能更好的预测下
学习啊学习

BeeLineGPS is a high performance Pocket PC cache navigation and management software tool. Import GPX files and manage thousands of waypoints with the advanced Waypoint Manger. View, manage and hunt geocaches with ease and confidence while having fun, a perfect paperless solution. BeeLineGPS also includes active waypoint technology where a waypoint can trigger a warning window for speed traps, safety cameras or play a sound byte while on a guided tour. Other features include waypoint averaging, altitude profiling and a comprehensive trip computer. BeeLineGPS is the ultimate GPS tool for your geocaching and outdoor needs.
BeeLineGPS waypoint database can support thousands of waypoints with over 120 icons to depict specific locations. If you don’t see a specific icon, ask for it and we’ll add it.

downlosd:
ftp://carc:crac@b21.com/VisualGPS.BeeLineGPS.v1.82.121.XScale.WM2003.WM5.Cracked-SyMPDA.rar

There is map of USA based on Teleatlas datasource - 2007.01 and build - 070711 with 3 Million POI.

http://uploaded.to/?id=1s92pn - USA Alaska - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=u3jdqp - USA Alabama - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=us87tw - USA Arizona - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=adeyjb - USA Arkansas - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=y44ymk - USA California - 2007.01 - 070711 :
http://uploaded.to/?id=12a09c - USA Colorado - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=eta96z - USA Connecticut - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=345gkf - USA Delaware - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=wgzzce - USA District Of Columbia - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=yzc2t9 - USA Florida - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=q1mm25 - USA Georgia - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=sqemic - USA Guam - 2005.2 - 060921
http://uploaded.to/?id=fs6kj6 - USA Hawaii - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=itoqel - USA Idaho - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=7uusxl - USA Illinois - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=l9btht - USA Indiana - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=sna1nd - USA Iowa - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=rzu8g1 - USA Kansas - 2007.01 - 070711 .(t<u


http://uploaded.to/?id=w6spf2 - USA Kentucky - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=ly4fjt - USA Louisiana - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=hvt4jq - USA Maine - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=8btep1 - USA Maryland - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=tpuszc - USA Massachusetts - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=zesx2d - USA Michigan - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=fa9df5 - USA Minnesota - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=a24abl - USA Mississippi - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=380vjq - USA Missouri - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=cnjr15 - USA Montana - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=n9161h - USA Nebraska - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=x913zd - USA Nevada - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=uwt2n4 - USA New Hamphire - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=tmh4×0 - USA New Jersey - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=jwjkyz - USA New Mexico - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=4ycm4s - USA New York - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=m69×2q - USA Norh Carolina - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=pvizp5 - USA North Dakota - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=yqbdf0 - USA Ohio - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=duv06h - USA Oklahoma - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=evt7s1 - USA Oregon - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=hsz1p1 - USA Pennsylvania - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=ee38am - USA Puerto Rico - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=0h5lan - USA Rhode Island - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=kiyyrl - USA South Carolina - 2007.01 - 070711 
http://uploaded.to/?id=vqxfuh - USA South Dakota - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=uyo1px - USA Tennessee - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=8qte92 - USA Texas - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=fcbb14 - USA Utah - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=xeosmt - USA Vermont - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=q7np7c - USA Virginia - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=e8z52z - USA Washington - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=d5z9i8 - USA Waters - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=wb02xi - USA West Virginia - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=isc4ff - USA Wisconsin - 2007.01 - 070711
http://uploaded.to/?id=64vmtw - USA Wyoming - 2007.01 - 070711

In addition:
http://uploaded.to/?id=la0ztg - Canada - 2007.01 - 070705 - 3M POI
http://uploaded.to/?id=fog23c - Canada - 2007.01 - 070705 - 12M POI

http://uploaded.to/?id=292koc - USA Major Roads - 2007.01 - 070705

http://www.aa-information.com/aavsurvey/AAVSurvey.php?memType=3&aairmailid=0607aav_newSite

This offer came in the AA Airmail newsletter dated 06/20/2007

Take A Survey And Subscribe To American Airlines Vacations Offers
Want to earn AAdvantage miles without going anywhere? Just fill out our Travel Survey and sign up to receive weekly emails with the latest news and special offers from American Airlines Vacations. Our goal is to provide you with a more personalized travel experience, and by understanding your travel interests, we are better able to serve up deals and promotions that are more customized to your needs. For details, click the title/link above this post.

You will need your AA ff acct number and an email address that will be used by yourself to have a confirmation copy of the 250 miles survey taken. After you have finished the survey,make sure to grab the confirmation email,incase your 250 aa miles are not posted within the
8-10 weeks. If you use a mass spam type of email address, make you have access to incoming emails at that email address,since your confirmation email is your proof..
ronald

Copy-paste of survey confirmation:

From: AmericanAirlines Vacations
Date: (the date you took the survey and time.)
To: (the registered email address you have inserted in the survey…)
Subject: Thank You For Your Survey Participation

Thank you for taking the time to fill out the AmericanAirlines VacationsSM Travel Survey. In appreciation of your participation we will credit your AAdvantage® account with 250 bonus miles within the next 8-10 weeks.

If you’ve signed up to receive AmericanAirlines Vacations e-mails, going forward we will send customized offers and promotions to you, thanks to the information you provided on your survey.

It will take 8-10 weeks for the miles to post.

Sign up to receive AmericanAirlines Vacations e-mails.
Sign up for an AAdvantage membership.
Visit AAVacations.com to learn more or book a vacation.

Sincerely,

AmericanAirlines Vacations

By John Shinal, MarketWatch
Last Update: 6:01 AM ET Jan 21, 2006

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — I’m not sure what’s more troubling — the fact that the U.S. government wanted to get its hands on the Internet search results of millions of its citizens, or that some of the leading search firms were so quick to provide the data.
Privacy — or the lack of it — on the Internet came screaming to the front burner this week on the news that Google Inc. was the only one of four major U.S. search engines to refuse a Justice Department subpoena to provide information on its users’ search results.
Not that Google has always been the white knight. Like Yahoo Inc. and Microsoft Corp., Google has previously responded to government requests — in China — to censor or turn over its data.
Rather than tracking down and jailing dissidents, as the Chinese government did with information provided by Yahoo, the subpoena by U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales is part of an effort to revive a 1998 law designed to protect children from seeing or being exploited by online pornography.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the law as too broad in 2004, saying, among other things, that the government should give Web-filtering software a chance to work. See archived story.
Trolling through two month’s worth of random results at the world’s leading search engine, as the government’s original subpoena requested, presumably would give Justice Department investigators a good read on what percentage of those searches were for child porn.
But some privacy advocates, coming to Google’s defense, called the effort a fishing expedition that completely disregards the privacy of the millions of browsers who conduct innocent searches.
“This could have a chilling effect on how people use the Internet,” said Evan Hendricks, who’s edited and published Privacy Times newsletter in Washington, D.C., since 1981.
Even more troubling to Hendricks was that Google’s search rivals, including Yahoo Inc. (YHOO : Yahoo! Inc
News , chart , profile , more
Last: 22.92-0.44-1.88%

4:00pm 08/03/2007

Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
YHOO22.92, -0.44, -1.9%) and Time Warner Inc.’s AOL unit, did provide the government with search result data. Microsoft Corp. (MSFT : Microsoft Corporation
News , chart , profile , more
Last: 28.96-0.56-1.90%

4:00pm 08/03/2007

Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
MSFT28.96, -0.56, -1.9%) declined to comment on whether it received a subpoena, but a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, which sued to overturn the 1998 law, told MarketWatch the software giant did.
Although AOL (TWX : time warner inc com
News , chart , profile , more
Last: 18.61-0.29-1.53%

4:13pm 08/03/2007

Delayed quote dataAdd to portfolio
Analyst
Create alertInsider
Discuss
Financials
Sponsored by:
TWX18.61, -0.29, -1.5%) and Yahoo said they complied in a limited way that would keep its search users anonymous, Hendricks was skeptical of that guarantee.
“There’s no way to be sure that those search results can’t be used later to track people down for all sorts of reasons,” he said.
One privacy lawyer not involved in the case agreed.
Under the Electronic Communication Privacy Act, government prosecutors have fairly wide latitude to subpoena emails and other electronic communications if they have probable cause to believe a crime has been committed, said Andrew Serwin, a partner with the law firm Foley & Lardner LLP.
If an individual user had made thousands of searches for child porn, for example, “there’s nothing stopping federal prosecutors from issuing another subpoena to learn the Internet address of the person who made those requests,” said Serwin.
I would argue that anyone exploiting children over the Internet deserves to be tracked down and prosecuted.
But what if the government decided to use the same method to track down people who used questionable tax shelters?
How much right should the government have to use private-sector records to troll for possible criminal activity?
“As a society, we have to decide how far the government can go to establish probable cause” that a crime has been committed, Serwin said.
Google has already paid a price for its refusal, at least in the stock market. Shares of the Mountain View, Calif.-based firm, whose stock has risen five-fold since it went public in August 2004, suffered their biggest percentage drop ever Friday. See full story.
On a day when the broader technology sector suffered its biggest point drop in more than two years, it’s unclear whether the drop was due to general investor bearishness or fears that Internet users may be more reluctant to use search engines if they know the results could be reviewed by law enforcement agencies.
Google’s shares dropped more than those of Yahoo, Microsoft and Time-Warner, which complied with the subpoena. Part of the Google bearishness stems from the cost that Google might incur from a protracted legal fight.
If Google decides to go to court, its success in resisting the government would turn on whether the government’s request is allowed under a part of the Electronic Communication Privacy Act that deals with stored communications.
That law, according to Serwin, is “cumbersome, difficult to understand and has been interpreted in many ways” by various courts. “As written, it’s a bad law,” he said.
So much gray area makes it likely that the two sides may choose to compromise, rather than slug it out before a judge.
Google obviously has other things to do, like figure out how to get their search results on iPods. And should the government pursue the case and lose, its anti-porn efforts would be hamstrung.
Still, another privacy watcher said it’s important that Google stand on principle.
“It’s important that they fight this, or else every prosecutor is going to start using Google as its research service,” said Jim Harper, director of information policy studies at the Cato Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank.
Given the experience of Internet companies in China, it’s important to draw the line now, according to Harper.
Last month, Microsoft Corp.’s MSN unit pulled the plug on a Chinese blogger who discussed politically-sensitive issues. Yahoo has also shared such data, which led to the conviction and jailing of a journalist, and Google itself has agreed to make its search results in that country amenable to surveillance.
“This request (for Google’s data) is disturbing because it’s the nose under the camel’s tent,” Harper said. If we’re not careful, control and censorship of Internet data in this country “could look more like China than we thought possible,” he said.
John Shinal is a technology editor for MarketWatch in San Francisco.
From:http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid=%7B54C61B89%2D2A96%2D4DAD%2DA844%2DA9B994AE79C7%7D&siteid=google

http://rs101.rapidshare.com/files/44092886/iGuidance_v4.zip

bt 哦